Which instructional objective is written completely and correctly?

Enhance your knowledge of phonetics and phonology with tailored flashcards and multiple choice questions. Prepare efficiently with hints and detailed explanations. Ensure exam success!

Multiple Choice

Which instructional objective is written completely and correctly?

Explanation:
Clear instructional objectives specify exactly what the learner will do, under what conditions, and how well (the observable behavior, the setup, and the mastery criterion). In this item, the target behavior is producing the /k/ sound. The conditions are explicit: the learner must do this after hearing and seeing a model of /k/ and while using a specific articulatory cue (tongue blade holding the tongue tip down). The criterion is concrete: the behavior must be produced correctly over three consecutive trials before moving on to the next step. This combination makes the objective observable, measurable, and progression-based, so mastery can be reliably tracked. The other options don’t meet these standards as cleanly. One includes extrinsic reinforcement tied to a game, and the articulatory description is off for the target sound. Another uses an impractical context and vague requirements, making it hard to measure. The last option describes producing the sound in varied syllables after a model but lacks a clear, quantifiable criterion to determine mastery.

Clear instructional objectives specify exactly what the learner will do, under what conditions, and how well (the observable behavior, the setup, and the mastery criterion). In this item, the target behavior is producing the /k/ sound. The conditions are explicit: the learner must do this after hearing and seeing a model of /k/ and while using a specific articulatory cue (tongue blade holding the tongue tip down). The criterion is concrete: the behavior must be produced correctly over three consecutive trials before moving on to the next step. This combination makes the objective observable, measurable, and progression-based, so mastery can be reliably tracked.

The other options don’t meet these standards as cleanly. One includes extrinsic reinforcement tied to a game, and the articulatory description is off for the target sound. Another uses an impractical context and vague requirements, making it hard to measure. The last option describes producing the sound in varied syllables after a model but lacks a clear, quantifiable criterion to determine mastery.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy